At Lloyd’s Register Foundation, our focus is on transitions which create new risks due to gaps in knowledge, standards, and skills. This is also the case with transitioning to nature-positive infrastructure.
Nature-positive infrastructure involves working with dynamic systems that evolve over time through environmental conditions and feedback loops. Ports are a good example: infrastructure, sediments, habitats and operations continuously interact and evolve. While engineers have always worked with dynamic systems, nature-positive infrastructure introduces greater variability because natural systems cannot be predicted or managed with any certainty.
If infrastructure behaves as a dynamic system, the question becomes: how do we manage that behaviour over time? The key here is advanced modelling, long term monitoring, and adaptive intervention. Safety is achieved not through eliminating uncertainty, but by actively responding to it.
Port developers are only one actor within a broader ecosystem. Much of the risk is locked in during design and construction through decisions on site selection, materials and layout, which shape long-term interactions between infrastructure and natural systems.
The argument here is that you cannot design safe, nature-positive infrastructure at project level alone. You need ecosystem-level coordination, shared metrics, and aligned incentives.
The World Economic Forum and Lloyd's Register Foundation's Accelerating Critical Transformations for Ports (ACT Ports) initiative highlights that “the critical shift is not from grey to green infrastructure, but from project delivery to ecosystem orchestration”. Fragmentation amplifies instability.
Safety at a systems level is achieved through coordinated governance, data, skills and environmental integration. Transforming approaches to engineering will require an entire ecosystem of actors to rethink how risk, value and performance are assessed and integrated into infrastructure decision-making.
It is also worth noting that nature-positive infrastructure will create new working environments, for example, working from floating platforms or on uneven natural terrains, and operating in tidal zones. More research is needed into the occupational safety and health impacts of these new scenarios.
The transition to nature-positive infrastructure is not simply about replacing grey infrastructure with green alternatives. It requires new evidence, metrics, skills and governance approaches across the infrastructure ecosystem.
If nature-positive approaches are to become mainstream, engineers, financiers, policymakers, clients and operators will all need to participate in reshaping how infrastructure is planned, delivered and managed. The prize is significant: infrastructure that is not only better for nature and climate, but safer and more resilient for the communities that depend on it.
This article has been developed based on a presentation given by Dagmara Karbowska at the XXXIInd Global ISSA Construction Conference took place from July 2–3, 2026, in Limassol, Cyprus. Program – XXXIInd Global ISSA Construction Conference.